Forum

Notifications
Clear all

sauble rules meetings

Page 3 / 5

Posts: 0
(@justracin)
Joined: 1 second ago

a ? for all ....would the new thunder body rule come under......"some teams will want to spend more cash instead of moving up a class"........ as I said earlyer in this thread. ........... just stirrin the pot here ...but does any one got a good reason to allow this?


Reply
Posts: 0
(@larue)
Joined: 1 second ago

Wait till the first time someone with a steel bodied car runs all down the side of a fiberglass car.....Pieces will be everwhere ;D ;D ;D


Reply
Posts: 0
(@justracin)
Joined: 1 second ago

Wait till the first time someone with a steel bodied car runs all down the side of a fiberglass car.....Pieces will be everwhere ;D ;D ;D

I will find that to be very funny!!!lol...!!!!        how about something really funny wait till next years rule meeting (or2-3)when they want to outlaw steel bodies because they are to hard on the guys trying to run a good lookin glass body!


Reply
Posts: 0
(@larue)
Joined: 1 second ago

about 4/5 years ago in limited lates,there were still some guys running steel bodied cars.At peterboro,i got rear end by one,torn the shit out of my car...no joking!!!


Reply
Posts: 0
(@justracin)
Joined: 1 second ago

thanks you just made my point  ...........would that be the first year for llm  before that they were challengers right ? don't most tracks have just lm class now dropping the limited name making way for the open lm class IE: your Shaw's and MacDonell's and so on....................first we had challenger then llm then your Barrie lm, Varny lm Sauble lm....ect...ect.....now its ok to call them lm                   


Reply
Page 3 / 5
Share: