PC, I think that there are far greater human rights issues that you could be focusing your attention on, besides a short track paying extra prize money to increase diversity.
You are probally right that their are more egregious human rights violations in Ontario then the one we are discussing now . However we are discussing the one that potentially could effect me down the road if policies like this were implemented into regular Saturday night racing . I believe this is the proverbial "slippery slope" and should be stopped in its tracks .
Is there a plausible attempt to go down that road (ie. has it even been mentioned/discussed/thought of by anyone other than yourself) or are you just grasping at straws?
It is amazing that PC believes its okay to discriminate against women by denying them the opportunity to race but its not okay to offer them an incentive to race. Gotta love PC ... can't wait to see the next topic in PCs tired old tirade against women.
Whats your next angle PC?
Your post makes no sense Mobil1fan . The fact is if Jack wins he gets $ 600 if Jill wins she gets $ 1100 . I don't know what you do for a living but i think i will go with what the lawyer told me .
No, the fact is if Jack wins he gets $600 and if Jill wins she gets $600 plus a $500 bonus (of which she meets the qualifications) and legally that makes all the difference in the world.
mobil two people are working at the same job one female one male, whoever sells the most cars gets a bonus of $500 but if you are a male you get a $1000 and a female would get the $500, would this be alright with you? same theory and 100% agaisnt the charter
Not the same theory at all. Your scenario deals with labor laws whereas the situation with Enduro has nothing to do with labor law at all. Just to humor you, there could be plausible explanations for that scenario (seniority, commission payscale, etc.) which would make it acceptable.
Like I said before, I couldn't care less if you go on and on about this, the fact of the matter is it is not illegal in any way, shape or form.
mobil i respect your right to be wrong. the charter of rights is enforce at all times in all places it has been entrenched into constitutional law when 9 out of ten provinces passed it.
Of course the Charter is enforced, but it is not directly enforced in people's day to day lives like you're trying to argue. People get charged with violations of the law, not direct offenses against the Charter. I'm not wrong here.