Forum

Notifications
Clear all

2013 Season changes

Page 2 / 5

Posts: 0
(@notingtolose)
Joined: 1 second ago

they had 30 of them for the pumpkinsmasher/rain fest and they p[ut on a really good show.so you dont need 40-50 of them you just need around 20-30 to put on a good show


Reply
Posts: 0
(@jcrashm2)
Joined: 1 second ago

and it was a crappy rainy day or they would have had even more...i heard they are talking about adding a couple of 4 cylinder races on regular nites...


Reply
Posts: 0
(@Snotrod)
Joined: 1 second ago

2. Enduro cars are worth some money - how does leaving them on the track increase car counts? More wrecked cars / possible injury? Doesn't make sense to me.
3. Should have weight penalties for top 5 Enduro cars.

2. It discourages teams from spending large amounts of $$$ when the car could be wrecked. Enduro used to be like that, but with the speeds they travel at now (due to less cars), it wouldn't be the safest ideas. As much as I want to see cars left on the track, it's not the right idea.

3. I like this idea a lot, and I think it should be proposed during the Enduro rules meeting next week. If they keep winning, keep adding weight.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@Wernham)
Joined: 1 second ago

I disagree with a weight penalty.  If a guy has built a car that can legally pass tech, why does he get a penalty for the time, effort, talent he has put into his car? Why don't they actually just penalize cars that do not meet the rules instead of a slap on the wrist or warning?


Reply
Posts: 0
 kcbc
(@kcbc)
Joined: 1 second ago

😉 Jeff w. I can't find the like button ,but that's what I've been saying for along time ,a guy does his home work and gets his car working,improves his driving skills and gets faster and he gets penalized for it. Not far or rite....This is racing,if the car passes tech then the others need to step up their game not shoot the guy that has done the work.


Reply
Page 2 / 5
Share: