Thanks Ashley, you've confirmed exactly what I thought. What Sandra may not know is that Dwayne has three late models.........The cra/florida/deleware late model, straight rail i think, and a 604 i think, that's the one I beleive brandon drove saturday...........the limited late that he ran mostly at sunset...........and the super late that dwayne ran on sunday
No problem and yes, the cra/florida/delaware late model was the car that Brandon drove on Saturday.
AaronM29, you're right that Brandon has his own late model. Maybe it was a decision that Brandon & Dwayne made together in having Brandon run Dwayne's cause 1) Dwayne wasn't racing and 2) to keep Brandon's car for the races he has left on the JEGS/CRA schedule.
Did Walters run in the limited lates or is it like someone was saying , he actually is done racing for this year because of the injuries suffered last sat. night. I thought from what i heard from the track sat. night that Baker was banned the rest of this year , if not next year too. If he got a 2 week suspension for the head on crash into walters 2 weeks prior,what happened this time,anybody know. Just out of curiosity i see Mark Dilley on the site almost every day,maybe he can put this to pasture once and for all for us. Thanks
Tom did not run at all this weekend he is still injured. As for the suspension I think the track will be doing a great injustice to every other racer there if Baker is not suspended for at least a year as he is repeat offender. If the track doesnt do this they are setting a very bad precedent and you all better hold onto your boots next year for a lot of wrecked race cars because alot of guys will take a one week to settle a score without hesitation. The longer the track waits for an official announcement the worse it looks.
well said yetti!
Going to have a hard time doing that. For all the things that Walters been let away with over the years, there is no possible way to penalize anyone without making it look like favoritism. How many people has he dumped without even getting sent to the back? Problem was out of hand long before Baker was part of it.
Right or wrong, you poke and poke and poke, someone is going to sock it to you back. Even if Baker’s actions were wrong, I'm finding it hard to find sympathy for one who lives by the sword, then gets cut by another’s.
Maybe the good that will come out of this is next time Tom will drive around a car like the can, rather than choosing to drive into it.
Yetti How can you call not suspending someone for purposely causing serious injuries to someone not justified. Wheres the favoritism in this.