Sorry Herb that wasnt an answer to your ?
He had adjustable center link and rear lower on right side and I dont think he had stock style tie rods either

I will say ...it cost me more to build a new Gen chassis three years ago then what McColl want for that one..I would buy one...its a great idea. no matter what in life the cost of everything goes up and people will always bitch about it....if you can't afford it get out....in any class

well i would think at the very least the weight balance issue is gone, how about track width? is it oem lowers? has the rule book changed to allow these?
I would think Casale is getting excited to see this my drive back some of his regs?

Looks like i can scratch sunset off my "must try" list........after that race at Flamboro i thought the thunder/super stocks were on the right track, there was a good cross section of cars there, but i guess problems that dont exist need to be solved and guys want to have a late model without buying it........i shouldve just retired instead of building again, all this change going on in Ontario annoys me.

They are designed to be identical to a metric chassis, it will use all the same stuff as what the metrics are, sunset has no track width rule, they were built off a stock spec sheet from merv walt with all the stock pick up poi ts, even the upper and lower a arm mounts are in stock location