Forum

Notifications
Clear all

Rules Meetings

Page 2 / 18

Posts: 0
(@streetstocker33)
Joined: 1 second ago

In regards to the rules meeting I think everybody should put forward that the changes made or the changes that we want should reflect what each division needs as a whole. I'm not trying to be overly critical but each division is a group and the needs of the "group" are important.
And above all the most important thing that the technical staff should consider is to develop the philosophy of "Say what your going to do and do what you say"
I don't think we need any more 11th hour rule changes

generally it's drivers/teams input that puts the screws to the divisions, kind of got the place into the mess it's in.


Reply
Posts: 0
(@jworacing)
Joined: 1 second ago

I agree and disagree, temperance is needed in these times. Why do i even bother? Screw it we might as well just have run what you brung and run the Late models with the Supers, might have dozen cars for next year


Reply
Posts: 0
(@streetstocker33)
Joined: 1 second ago

I agree and disagree, temperance is needed in these times. Why do i even bother? Screw it we might as well just have run what you brung and run the Late models with the Supers, might have dozen cars for next year

I thought it was run what you brung?


Reply
Posts: 0
(@ssfan)
Joined: 1 second ago

Just hope tech looks further into the glass bodied cars and adds more of a weight penalty to them!


Reply
Posts: 0
 kcbc
(@kcbc)
Joined: 1 second ago

??? What are you saying just come out with it and SAY IT what is your beef about them, or do you have no balls to say what's on your mind...


Reply
Page 2 / 18
Share: